Dividends and Buybacks Aren’t Always the Answer

Fabian Blank on Unsplash

When investors think about companies returning value to shareholders, dividends and share buybacks often come to mind. These two mechanisms are seen as tangible ways for companies to reward their shareholders, signaling financial health and commitment to delivering value.

However, while dividends and buybacks may seem beneficial on the surface, they are often misunderstood. This article explores these two common approaches and presents a contrarian view: dividends and buybacks are essentially zero-sum games and should only be employed when companies have no other profitable investment opportunities.

Dividends: Distributing Profits to Shareholders

Dividends are one of the most straightforward ways companies return value to shareholders. When a company pays a dividend, it distributes a portion of its profits directly to investors, usually on a quarterly basis. This is highly attractive for income-focused investors who seek a steady, predictable return on their investments. Regular dividend payments can provide a sense of stability, especially for companies in mature industries with limited growth prospects.

However, there’s a key factor often overlooked: when a company pays a dividend, the stock price drops by the amount of the dividend. For example, if a company pays a $2 dividend, mathematically, the stock price will decrease by $2 on the ex-dividend date. Essentially, shareholders are not receiving additional value—they are simply being handed a portion of the company’s cash that is then subtracted from the stock’s value.

Share Buybacks: Increasing Shareholder Ownership

Share buybacks are another popular tool companies use to return value. When a company buys back its own shares, it reduces the total number of outstanding shares in the market. This increases each remaining shareholder’s percentage of ownership, theoretically giving them a greater claim on future earnings.

Buybacks are often viewed positively because they improve key financial ratios, such as earnings per share (EPS), since the earnings are now spread over fewer shares. Additionally, buybacks can signal management’s confidence that the company is undervalued, making the repurchase a good use of cash.

However, the downside is that buybacks use company cash, which could otherwise be reinvested in growth opportunities. If the stock is not significantly undervalued, the buyback is merely reallocating existing value rather than creating new value. The company’s cash reserves are reduced, and unless this cash is truly excess and not needed for other profitable investments, the buyback could harm long-term growth potential.

The Traditional Investor Perspective: Why Dividends and Buybacks Are Valued

For many investors, dividends and share buybacks are highly attractive features of a stock. Dividends offer an immediate return on investment in the form of cash, which can be reinvested elsewhere or used as income. Share buybacks, on the other hand, are seen as a signal that the company’s management believes the stock is undervalued, which may increase investor confidence.

From an investor's perspective, companies that regularly return value through these mechanisms are often seen as stable and mature. Dividend-paying companies are frequently considered to have solid financials and consistent cash flows, while buybacks are interpreted as management aligning with shareholder interests. Together, these actions send a message of commitment to returning wealth to investors, which is why they are often prioritized by those seeking stable returns.

However, this leads to a critical question: are dividends and buybacks truly creating value for shareholders, or are they simply redistributing it?

The Contrarian View: Why Dividends and Buybacks Are Zero-Sum Games

While dividends and buybacks are widely appreciated, a contrarian perspective suggests that they are zero-sum games when a company has the potential to reinvest capital in projects with positive internal rates of return (“IRR”).

Dividends: When a dividend is paid, shareholders receive cash, but the stock’s value is reduced by the same amount. Thus, the investor’s overall wealth remains unchanged unless the cash can be reinvested in a project with better growth prospects. While dividends can be useful for income-focused investors, they are simply a reallocation of value, not the creation of new wealth.

Buybacks: Buybacks reduce the number of shares outstanding, which increases each shareholder’s percentage of ownership. However, if the company is using cash that could have been invested in growth projects, this action depletes resources that could drive future earnings. Like dividends, buybacks merely reallocate value and do not generate additional value unless the shares are deeply undervalued at the time of the buyback.

The key idea is that dividends and buybacks should only be used when a company cannot find projects that offer a positive IRR—opportunities that will generate a return greater than the company’s cost of capital. When companies reinvest in high-growth opportunities, they can compound earnings, which ultimately provides more value to shareholders than distributing excess cash.

What Investors Should Understand and Do When Value Is Distributed

When companies distribute value via dividends or buybacks, it’s essential for investors to understand that this often signals the company has run out of high-return investment opportunities. This can be a sign that the company has matured and no longer has profitable ways to reinvest its capital.

For investors, this distributed cash provides an opportunity to redeploy capital into other areas that may offer higher returns. For example, instead of holding onto a stock that is no longer growing rapidly, investors can seek out companies or sectors with more growth potential. Dividends and buybacks, in this sense, serve as signals to investors that they might need to shift their focus to better opportunities.

This doesn’t mean that dividends or buybacks are always bad. For mature companies with limited growth prospects, they can be an appropriate way to return value. However, investors should critically evaluate whether the distributed capital is better deployed elsewhere, where it could potentially generate higher returns.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Shareholder Value

Dividends and buybacks are popular methods of returning value to shareholders, but they are often misunderstood. These actions do not create new value—they merely redistribute existing value. While they can provide short-term benefits, they should only be employed when a company cannot find profitable projects to invest in.

For long-term investors, the key takeaway is to think critically when companies distribute value. When a company no longer has positive IRR projects to pursue, this distributed cash might be better invested elsewhere, in growth opportunities that can compound over time. Dividends and buybacks aren’t inherently bad, but the real value comes from understanding when they are the best choice—and when reinvestment in growth is the smarter move.

Stay Connected with The Alpha Oracle

Thank you for reading this article. If you found this analysis insightful, be sure to follow us on Seeking Alpha for more in-depth research and actionable investment ideas. Our Seeking Alpha profile features detailed company evaluations, market analysis, and exclusive investment strategies designed to help you navigate the financial markets with confidence.

Additionally, don’t miss out on our weekly newsletter! Every Sunday, we deliver a concise summary of the most intriguing investment ideas and market insights straight to your inbox. Subscribe now to stay ahead of the market and make informed investment decisions. Sign up for our newsletter here.

Stay informed. Stay empowered. Stay ahead with The Alpha Oracle.